Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Submitted February 25, 1876
Decided March 21, 1876
Page 470
D. Pratt for the appellant.
M. Hopkins for the respondent.
Per Curiam.
We think that the charge of the judge that Willetts had a right to waive the provision in the policy requiring the plaintiff to furnish the proofs of loss, was erroneous;
Page 471
and for this reason the judgment must be reversed, and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event.
All concur.
Judgment reversed.
27 N.Y.S.2d 198 CORDAS et al. v. PEERLESS TRANSP. CO. et al. City Court of…
222 N.Y. 88 (1917) Dec 4, 1917 · New York Court of Appeals Otis F. Wood, Appellant,…
81 A.D.2d 434 (1981) 440 N.Y.S. 2d 941 Aharon Rahabi, Appellant, v. Jack Morrison et…
48 Misc.2d 345 (1965) In the Matter of The Estate of Joseph Schlinger, Deceased. Surrogate's…
103 A.D.2d 632 (1984)481 N.Y.S. 2d 545 Angelo J. Bartolone, Appellant, v. Lynne A. L.…
Matter of C.C. v D.C. 2025 NY Slip Op 05017 Decided on September 18, 2025…