93 N.E. 1125 HERMAN A. WAGNER et al., Respondents, v. MORRIS WORTIS et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Submitted November 14, 1910 Decided November 22, 1910 Motion for re-argument denied, with ten dollars costs. (See 199 N.Y. 571.)
Articles Tagged: 93 N.E. 1125
MATTER OF MAYOR, ALDERMEN, AND COMMONALTY, N.Y., 199 N.Y. 559 (1910)
93 N.E. 1125 In the Matter of the Application of the MAYOR, ALDERMEN, AND COMMONALTY OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant and Respondent, Relative to Acquiring Lands Required for the Opening of Mount Vernon Avenue. ALFRED HUTTER et al., as Executors of LEOPOLD HUTTER et al., Respondents and Appellants. Court of Appeals of the […]
MATTER OF PEOPLE, 199 N.Y. 562 (1910)
93 N.E. 1125 In the Matter of the Application of THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, to Vacate an Order of the Supreme Court Directing the Clerk of New York County to Register PETER F. MULVEY, Appellant, as a Veterinary Surgeon, nunc pro tunc, as of December 31, 1890. Court of Appeals […]
PEOPLE EX REL. KEATING v. BINGHAM, 200 N.Y. 511 (1910)
93 N.E. 1125 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. WILLIAM KEATING et al., Appellants, v. THEODORE A. BINGHAM, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York, Respondent. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Submitted November 15, 1910 Decided November 29, 1910 Page 512 Edwin P. Kilroe for appellants. […]
MULLER v. GUICHARD, 199 N.Y. 575 (1910)
93 N.E. 1125 RICHARD MULLER, Doing Business under the Name of MULLER GLORIA MILLS, Appellant, v. ANTOINE GUICHARD, Doing Business under the Name of A. GUICHARD CO., Respondent. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Submitted October 5, 1910 Decided October 25, 1910 Morris J. Hirsch and Herbert R. Limburg for appellant. Chester A. […]
MILTON SCHNAIER COMPANY v. GRIGSBY, 199 N.Y. 577 (1910)
93 N.E. 1125 MILTON SCHNAIER COMPANY, Appellant, v. EMILIE B. GRIGSBY, Respondent. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued October 6, 1910 Decided October 25, 1910 Page 578 Milton Mayer for appellant. L. Laflin Kellogg and William K. Hartpence for respondent. Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion of SCOTT, J., below. Concur: CULLEN, […]
MATTER OF CITY OF NEW YORK, 200 N.Y. 509 (1910)
93 N.E. 1125 In the Matter of the Application of the CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent, Relative to Acquiring Title to Lands Required for the Opening of Mohegan Avenue. ADELAIDE V. BLACK, Appellant. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued November 14, 1910 Decided November 29, 1910 Page 510 George E. Baldwin for […]
MATTER OF CITY OF NEW YORK, 200 N.Y. 509 (1910)
93 N.E. 1125 In the Matter of the Application of the CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent, Relative to Acquiring Title to Lands Required for the Opening of Mohegan Avenue. ADELAIDE V. BLACK, Appellant. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued November 14, 1910 Decided November 29, 1910 Page 510 George E. Baldwin for […]