88 N.E. 1130 THERESA ROSSENBACH, Respondent, v. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE INDEPENDENT ORDER OF FORESTERS, Appellant. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued January 26, 1909 Decided February 9, 1909 O.P. Stockwell for appellant. Charles Van Voorhis and George V. Fleckenstein for respondent. Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: CULLEN, Ch. […]
Articles Tagged: 88 N.E. 1130
GROSS v. KATHAIRO CHEMICAL COMPANY, 195 N.Y. 535 (1909)
88 N.E. 1130 FRANK GROSS, Appellant, v. KATHAIRO CHEMICAL COMPANY, Respondent. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Submitted March 29, 1909 Decided April 6, 1909 Page 536 Albert Tameling for motion. A.S. Gilbert and Julius M. Mayer opposed. Motion granted on payment of one hundred dollars costs. On failure to pay the one […]
GROSS v. KATHAIRO CHEMICAL COMPANY, 195 N.Y. 535 (1909)
88 N.E. 1130 FRANK GROSS, Appellant, v. KATHAIRO CHEMICAL COMPANY, Respondent. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Submitted March 29, 1909 Decided April 6, 1909 Page 536 Albert Tameling for motion. A.S. Gilbert and Julius M. Mayer opposed. Motion granted on payment of one hundred dollars costs. On failure to pay the one […]
GROSS v. KATHAIRO CHEMICAL COMPANY, 195 N.Y. 535 (1909)
88 N.E. 1130 FRANK GROSS, Appellant, v. KATHAIRO CHEMICAL COMPANY, Respondent. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Submitted March 29, 1909 Decided April 6, 1909 Page 536 Albert Tameling for motion. A.S. Gilbert and Julius M. Mayer opposed. Motion granted on payment of one hundred dollars costs. On failure to pay the one […]
RIDGELY v. BERGSTROM, 195 N.Y. 537 (1909)
88 N.E. 1130 ALBERT N. RIDGELY, Respondent, v. OSCAR B. BERGSTROM et al., Comprising the Firm of BERGSTROM AND COMPANY, Appellants. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued March 24, 1909 Decided April 9, 1909 Page 538 Oscar B. Bergstrom for appellants. I.R. Oeland and Vine H. Smith for respondent. Judgment affirmed, with […]
WYSTRACH v. INTERBOROUGH RAPID TRANSIT COMPANY, 195 N.Y. 533 (1909)
88 N.E. 1130 FRIDA WYSTRACH, as Administratrix of the Estate of VINCENT WYSTRACH, Deceased, Appellant, v. INTERBOROUGH RAPID TRANSIT COMPANY, Respondent. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued March 22, 1909 Decided April 6, 1909 Augustus Van Wyck, Herbert D. Cohen and Richard J. Donovan for appellant. Henry W. Taft, Arthur C. Patterson […]
MATTER OF RUBENS, 195 N.Y. 527 (1909)
88 N.E. 1130 In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of CHARLES RUBENS, Deceased. MAURICE DREYFUS et al., Appellants; HENRY R. ICKELHEIMER et al., Respondents. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued March 15, 1909 Decided March 30, 1909 Page 528 J. Woolsey Shepard, Theodore H. Silkman, Edward P. Coyne, Edwards […]
TINSLEY v. SMITH, 194 N.Y. 581 (1909)
88 N.E. 1130 ADA V. TINSLEY, Respondent, v. JAMES A. SMITH et al., Co-partners under the Firm Name of THE EDWARD P. HAMPSON COMPANY et al., Defendants, and GENEVIEVE C. SKELLY et al., as Executors of PATRICK SKELLY, Deceased, Appellants. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued January 27, 1909 Decided February 9, […]
ROSE v. IMPERIAL ENGINE COMPANY, 195 N.Y. 515 (1909)
88 N.E. 1130 ZATTER W. ROSE, Respondent, v. IMPERIAL ENGINE COMPANY, Appellant. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued March 1, 1909 Decided March 16, 1909 Page 516 H.C. Mandeville and Francis E. Wood for appellant. Warren J. Cheney for respondent. Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, EDWARD […]
RIESGO v. CLARK, 194 N.Y. 600 (1909)
88 N.E. 1130 LOUIS A. RIESGO, Respondent, v. JAMES F.A. CLARK et al., Surviving Partners of the Firm of CLARK, WARD COMPANY, Appellants, Impleaded with Others. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued February 18, 1909 Decided March 5, 1909 Charles D. Cleveland and H.W. Hayward for appellants. David B. Ogden and Philip […]