81 N.E. 1162 HOWARD IRON WORKS, Respondent, v. BUFFALO ELEVATING COMPANY, Appellant. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued April 25, 1907 Decided May 10, 1907 Tracy C. Becker, Lincoln A. Groat and Alfred L. Becker for appellant. Loran L. Lewis, Jr., and William C. Carroll for respondent. Judgment affirmed, with costs; no […]
Articles Tagged: 81 N.E. 1162
MATTER OF HIRSCH, 188 N.Y. 584 (1907)
81 N.E. 1162 In the Matter of the Estate of FERDINAND HIRSCH, Deceased. EDWARD K. JONES, Appellant; MINNIE F. HIRSCH et al., Respondents. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued April 2, 1907 Decided April 16, 1907 Alton B. Parker, Edward W. Hatch, David McClure and Frank B. Church for appellant. Lemuel E. […]
CONSOLIDATED FRUIT JAR COMPANY v. WISNER, 188 N.Y. 624 (1907)
81 N.E. 1162 THE CONSOLIDATED FRUIT JAR COMPANY, Appellant, v. FRANK P. WISNER et al., as Executors of HENRY C. WISNER, Deceased, Respondents. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued April 26, 1907 Decided May 21, 1907 George A. Strong for appellant. William A. Sutherland and Edwin A. Nash for respondents. Judgment affirmed, […]
MATTER OF CITY OF NEW YORK, 189 N.Y. 508 (1907)
81 N.E. 1162 In the Matter of the Application of the CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant, Relative to Acquiring Lands for the Improvement of the Water Front. WILLIAM P. COLLINS et al., as Executors of WILLIAM COLLINS, Deceased, Respondents. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Submitted May 24, 1907 Decided June 11, 1907 […]
ROCHESTER DRY GOODS COMPANY v. FAHY, 188 N.Y. 629 (1907)
81 N.E. 1162 ROCHESTER DRY GOODS COMPANY, Appellant, v. LOUISE K. FAHY, Respondent. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued May 1, 1907 Decided May 21, 1907 Henry Adsit Bull for appellant. George A. Carnahan for respondent. Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, O’BRIEN, VANN, WERNER, WILLARD BARTLETT […]
TIERNAN v. MACK, 188 N.Y. 577 (1907)
81 N.E. 1162 JOHN TIERNAN, Respondent, v. NORMAN E. MACK, Appellant. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued April 1, 1907 Decided April 9, 1907 Spencer Brownell for motion. No one opposed. Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion.
RUSSELL v. NATIONAL EXHIBITION COMPANY, 188 N.Y. 602 (1907)
81 N.E. 1162 FRANK RUSSELL, Respondent, v. NATIONAL EXHIBITION COMPANY, Appellant. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued April 15, 1907 Decided April 30, 1907 Cornelius J. Sullivan, De Lancey Nicoll and Raymond D. Thurber for appellant. John M. Ward for respondent. Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, […]