ASH v. McNAMARA, 97 N.Y.2d 612 (2002)

769 N.E.2d 352, 742 N.Y.S.2d 605 BRENDA ASH, AS MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF GREGLORIA VAZQUEZ, AN INFANT, Appellant, v. JAMES N. McNAMARA, Respondent. 134Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Decided March 19, 2002. Motion for leave to appeal denied with one hundred dollars costs and necessary reproduction disbursements.

Read More

HALL v. MAY, 97 N.Y.2d 613 (2002)

769 N.E.2d 352, 742 N.Y.S.2d 605 JAMES HALL ET AL., Appellants, v. JOAN E. MAY, ET AL., Defendants, DONALD ACKLEY-PEROT ET AL., Respondents. 124Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Decided March 21, 2002. Motion for leave to appeal denied.

Read More

IN THE MATTER OF BOJARCZUK v. MILLS, 97 N.Y.2d 613 (2002)

769 N.E.2d 352, 742 N.Y.S.2d 605 IN THE MATTER OF JOSEPH T. BOJARCZUK, Appellant, v. RICHARD P. MILLS, AS COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL., Respondents. 77Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Decided March 21, 2002. Motion for leave to appeal granted.

Read More

PEOPLE v. DAME, 97 N.Y.2d 612 (2002)

769 N.E.2d 352, 742 N.Y.S.2d 605 THE PEOPLE C., BY ELIOT SPITZER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RICHARD J. DAME, INDIVIDUALLY AND d/b/a PRECISION ROOFING CO., Appellant. (APPEAL NO. 1.) (AND THREE ADDITIONAL APPEALS). 98Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Decided March 19, 2002. Motion for leave to […]

Read More

GABOR v. GOOLNICK, 97 N.Y.2d 613 (2002)

769 N.E.2d 352, 742 N.Y.S.2d 605 ABRAHAM GABOR, Respondent, v. STEPHEN B. GOOLNICK C., Defendant, THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant. 95Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Decided March 21, 2002. Motion for leave to appeal denied.

Read More

PEOPLE v. GOORD, 97 N.Y.2d 612 (2002)

769 N.E.2d 352, 742 N.Y.S.2d 605 THE PEOPLE C. EX REL. BARRY MONTGOMERY, Appellant, v. GLENN S. GOORD, C., ET AL., Respondents. 126Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Decided March 19, 2002. Motion for leave to appeal denied. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.

Read More

WASSERMAN v. EISENBERG, 97 N.Y.2d 613 (2002)

769 N.E.2d 352, 742 N.Y.S.2d 605 RANDIE M. WASSERMAN, Respondent, v. PHILIP EISENBERG, Appellant. 137Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Decided March 19, 2002. Motion for leave to appeal denied with one hundred dollars costs and necessary reproduction disbursements.

Read More

GUIDO v. STATE OF NEW YORK, 97 N.Y.2d 612 (2002)

769 N.E.2d 352, 742 N.Y.S.2d 605 JUDITH ANN COOPER GUIDO, C., ET AL., Respondents, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant. 82Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Decided March 19, 2002. Motion for leave to appeal denied with one hundred dollars costs and necessary reproduction disbursements.

Read More

IN THE MATTER OF VERONICA W., 97 N.Y.2d 613 (2002)

769 N.E.2d 352, 742 N.Y.S.2d 605 IN THE MATTER OF VERONICA W. ET AL. — ONEIDA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Respondent; KATHERINE P., Appellant. 231Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Decided March 19, 2002. Motion for leave to appeal denied.

Read More

SPIEGEL v. D.H. BLAIR CO., 97 N.Y.2d 612 (2002)

769 N.E.2d 352, 742 N.Y.S.2d 605 DR. GEORGE SPIEGEL, Appellant, v. D.H. BLAIR CO., INC., ET AL., Respondents. AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC., ET AL., Non-Party Respondents. 100Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Decided March 19, 2002. Motion for leave to appeal denied. Chief Judge Kaye took no part.

Read More

CALAFIORE v. PENNA, 97 N.Y.2d 612 (2002)

769 N.E.2d 352, 742 N.Y.S.2d 605 PAUL CALAFIORE, Appellant, v. CAROL PENNA, Defendant, RAMADA, INC., ET AL., Respondents. 130Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Decided March 19, 2002. Motion for leave to appeal denied with one hundred dollars costs and necessary reproduction disbursements.

Read More

MATTER OF JUDD v. MANHATTAN AND BRONX TRANSIT, 97 N.Y.2d 612 (2002)

769 N.E.2d 352, 742 N.Y.S.2d 605 IN THE MATTER OF MARY JUDD, Appellant, v. TRUSTEES OF MANHATTAN AND BRONX SURFACE TRANSIT OPERATING AUTHORITY PENSION PLAN, Respondent. 101Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Decided March 19, 2002. Motion for leave to appeal denied with one hundred dollars costs and necessary reproduction disbursements.

Read More

MATTER OF JUDD v. MANHATTAN AND BRONX TRANSIT, 97 N.Y.2d 612 (2002)

769 N.E.2d 352, 742 N.Y.S.2d 605 IN THE MATTER OF MARY JUDD, Appellant, v. TRUSTEES OF MANHATTAN AND BRONX SURFACE TRANSIT OPERATING AUTHORITY PENSION PLAN, Respondent. 101Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Decided March 19, 2002. Motion for leave to appeal denied with one hundred dollars costs and necessary reproduction disbursements.

Read More

MATTER OF JUDD v. MANHATTAN AND BRONX TRANSIT, 97 N.Y.2d 612 (2002)

769 N.E.2d 352, 742 N.Y.S.2d 605 IN THE MATTER OF MARY JUDD, Appellant, v. TRUSTEES OF MANHATTAN AND BRONX SURFACE TRANSIT OPERATING AUTHORITY PENSION PLAN, Respondent. 101Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Decided March 19, 2002. Motion for leave to appeal denied with one hundred dollars costs and necessary reproduction disbursements.

Read More