71 N.E. 1139 CARRIE A. ROBINSON et al., by EDWARD C. MANNERS, their Guardian ad Litem, et al., Appellants, v. CHARLES ADAMS et al., Partners under the Firm Name of ADAMS, McNEILL BRIGHAM, Respondents. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued June 17, 1904 Decided August 5, 1904 Edward Bruce Hill for appellants. […]
Articles Tagged: 71 N.E. 1139
FANNING v. SUPREME COUNCIL OF THE CATHOLIC MUT., 178 N.Y. 629 (1904)
71 N.E. 1139 CATHERINE J. FANNING, Respondent, v. THE SUPREME COUNCIL OF THE CATHOLIC MUTUAL BENEFIT ASSOCIATION, Respondent, and HANORA DALTON, Appellant. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued May 11, 1904 Decided May 31, 1904 Page 630 Julius M. Mayer and Abraham S. Gilbert for appellant. James Kearney for plaintiff, respondent. J. […]
ROOSEVELT v. SCHILE, 179 N.Y. 562 (1904)
71 N.E. 1139 JOHN E. ROOSEVELT et al., as Trustees under the Will of JAMES I. ROOSEVELT, Deceased, Appellants, v. ROMEO H. SCHILE et al., Respondents. SAME, Appellants, v. SAME, Respondents. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued October 5, 1904 Decided October 11, 1904 George H. Yeaman, George C. Kobbe and James […]
ROCHESTER FOLDING BOX COMPANY v. BROWNE, 179 N.Y. 542 (1904)
71 N.E. 1139 ROCHESTER FOLDING BOX COMPANY, Respondent, v. GEORGE W. BROWNE et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued June 6, 1904 Decided August 5, 1904 C.D. Kiehel for appellants. Elbridge L. Adams for respondent. Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: PARKER, Ch. J., BARTLETT, MARTIN, […]
SLADE v. HALE, 179 N.Y. 543 (1904)
71 N.E. 1139 WILLIAM H. SLADE, Appellant, v. GERTRUDE A. HALE, Individually and as Executrix of EDWARD C. HALE, Deceased, Respondent. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued June 7, 1904 Decided August 5, 1904 Edmund P. Cottle and O.O. Cottle for appellant. Helen Z.M. Rodgers and Adolph Rebadow for respondent. Judgment affirmed, […]
SMITH v. NEW YORK, CHICAGO AND ST. LOUIS RAILROAD CO., 178 N.Y. 635 (1904)
71 N.E. 1139 ALBERT E. SMITH, Respondent, v. THE NEW YORK, CHICAGO AND ST. LOUIS RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued May 18, 1904 Decided June 3, 1904 Louis L. Babcock for appellant. Tracy C. Becker for respondent. Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: PARKER, Ch. J., MARTIN, […]
SCANLON v. VILLAGE OF WEEDSPORT, 179 N.Y. 547 (1904)
71 N.E. 1139 JOHN SCANLON, Respondent, v. THE VILLAGE OF WEEDSPORT, Appellant. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued June 14, 1904 Decided August 5, 1904 Frederic E. Storke for appellant. Frank D. Wright for respondent. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Questions certified not answered, because as the appeal was from a final judgment […]
MATTER OF SIMONDS FURNACE COMPANY, 179 N.Y. 519 (1904)
71 N.E. 1139 In the Matter of the Dissolution of the SIMONDS FURNACE COMPANY. NASON MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Appellant; LEWIS W. RAYMOND, as Receiver, Respondent. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued May 31, 1904 Decided June 14, 1904 Page 520 Charles De Hart Brower for appellant. Harry S. Sleicher for respondent. Order affirmed, […]