65 N.E. 1123 THE UTICA CITY NATIONAL BANK, Respondent, v. GERTRUDE L. TALLMAN, Appellant. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued October 23, 1902 Decided November 18, 1902 Barclay E.V. McCarty for appellant. William P. Quin for respondent. Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: PARKER, Ch. J., GRAY, O’BRIEN, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, MARTIN […]
Articles Tagged: 65 N.E. 1123
LOWRY v. COLLATERAL LOAN ASSOCIATION, 172 N.Y. 633 (1902)
65 N.E. 1123 MARY B. LOWRY, Respondent, v. COLLATERAL LOAN ASSOCIATION, Appellant. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued October 24, 1902 Decided November 11, 1902 James C. de La Mare for appellant. Henry G.K. Heath for respondent. Per Curiam. This appeal presents the same questions, arising in the same way and argued […]
OSWEGO COUNTY SAVINGS BANK v. TOWN OF GENOA, 172 N.Y. 635 (1902)
65 N.E. 1123 THE OSWEGO COUNTY SAVINGS BANK, Appellant, v. THE TOWN OF GENOA, Respondent. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued October 29, 1902 Decided November 11, 1902 Israel T. Deyo and S.M. Coon for appellant. Frederic E. Storke for respondent. Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinions at Trial Term and Appellate […]
GOLDMARK v. MAGNOLIA ANTIFRICTION METAL COMPANY, 172 N.Y. 645 (1902)
65 N.E. 1123 ADOLPH GOLDMARK, Respondent, v. THE MAGNOLIA ANTIFRICTION METAL COMPANY, Appellant, Impleaded with Another. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Submitted November 10, 1902 Decided November 18, 1902 Page 646 L.A. Gould for motion. Alexander S. Bacon opposed. Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
ZAPF v. CARTER, 172 N.Y. 666 (1902)
65 N.E. 1123 FRANCIS X. ZAPF, Appellant, v. LULU N. CARTER, Respondent, Impleaded with Others. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Submitted December 8, 1902 Decided December 9, 1902 Page 667 George C. Carter for motion. John Conboy opposed. Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
WEIGLEY v. KNEELAND, 172 N.Y. 625 (1902)
65 N.E. 1123 WILLIAM W. WEIGLEY, Respondent, v. SYLVESTER H. KNEELAND, Appellant. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued October 14, 1902 Decided October 31, 1902 Joseph G. Deane for appellant. Franklin Bartlett for respondent. Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: PARKER, Ch. J., GRAY, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, MARTIN, CULLEN and WERNER, JJ. […]
TRUST AND DEPOSIT CO. OF ONONDAGA v. TOWNSEND VERITY, 172 N.Y. 620 (1902)
65 N.E. 1123 TRUST AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF ONONDAGA, Respondent, v. TOWNSEND VERITY et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Another. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued October 9, 1902 Decided October 28, 1902 Theodore E. Hancock and James C. De La Mare for appellants. L.B. Williams for respondent. Judgment affirmed, with costs; no […]
JAMES CURRAN MFG. CO. v. AULTMAN TAYLOR MACHINERY CO., 172 N.Y. 623 (1902)
65 N.E. 1123 JAMES CURRAN MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Respondent, v. THE AULTMAN TAYLOR MACHINERY COMPANY, Appellant. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued October 14, 1902 Decided October 28, 1902 William H. Blymyer and John Holden for appellant. John J. Delany for respondent. Judgment affirmed, with costs, on prevailing opinion below. Concur: PARKER, Ch. […]
STANNARD v. WHITESTONE FORGE AND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, 172 N.Y. 627 (1902)
65 N.E. 1123 ELBERT STANNARD, Respondent, v. THE WHITESTONE FORGE AND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Appellant. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued October 16, 1902 Decided October 31, 1902 Carlos C. Alden, Ingle Carpenter and James R. Rogers for appellant. Albert G. McDonald for respondent. Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: PARKER, Ch. […]
WAGNER v. BUFFALO AND ROCHESTER TRANSIT COMPANY, 172 N.Y. 634 (1902)
65 N.E. 1123 MARTIN WAGNER, Appellant, v. THE BUFFALO AND ROCHESTER TRANSIT COMPANY, Respondent. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued October 27, 1902 Decided November 11, 1902 Heman W. Morris for appellant. John D. Burns for respondent. Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: GRAY, O’BRIEN, MARTIN, VANN, CULLEN and WERNER, JJ. […]
WEST v. BANIGAN, 172 N.Y. 622 (1902)
65 N.E. 1123 JAMES GARNER WEST, Respondent, v. WILLIAM P. BANIGAN et al., Appellants. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued October 13, 1902 Decided October 28, 1902 Arthur S. Tompkins and Richard S. Harvey for appellants. A.H.F. Seeger for respondent. Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: PARKER, Ch. J., GRAY, BARTLETT, […]
WEST v. BANIGAN, 172 N.Y. 622 (1902)
65 N.E. 1123 JAMES GARNER WEST, Respondent, v. WILLIAM P. BANIGAN et al., Appellants. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued October 13, 1902 Decided October 28, 1902 Arthur S. Tompkins and Richard S. Harvey for appellants. A.H.F. Seeger for respondent. Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: PARKER, Ch. J., GRAY, BARTLETT, […]