APPLEBY, MATTER OF, v. BATES Court of Appeals of the State of New York. ____ Appeal from (3d dept.: 279 App. Div. 966) MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL. Denied.
Articles Tagged: 304 N.Y. 985
BATA v. BATA, 304 N.Y. 985 (____)
BATA v. BATA, A.S. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. ____ Appeal from (1st dept.: 279 App. Div. 1002) MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL. Dismissed. (Same in full, ante, p. 644.)
MATTER OF BACKMAN v. BATES, 304 N.Y. 985 (____)
BACKMAN, MATTER OF, v. BATES Court of Appeals of the State of New York. ____ Appeal from (3d dept.: 279 App. Div. 1115) MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL. Granted.
MATTER OF ATKINS v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF UNIV. OF STATE, 304 N.Y. 985 (____)
ATKINS, MATTER OF, v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF UNIV. OF STATE OF N Y Court of Appeals of the State of New York. ____ Appeal from (3d dept.: 279 App. Div. 966) MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL. Denied.
BOYD v. SHERIDAN DUNCAN, INC., 304 N.Y. 985 (____)
BOYD v. SHERIDAN DUNCAN, INC. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. ____ Appeal from (1st dept.: 280 App. Div. 970) MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL. Denied.
BRUNING v. BRUNING, 304 N.Y. 985 (____)
BRUNING v. BRUNING Court of Appeals of the State of New York. ____ Appeal from (2d dept.: 279 App. Div. 752) MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL. Denied.
BARTLETT v. MT. ZION BAPTIST CHURCH OF PORT CHESTER, 304 N.Y. 985 (____)
BARTLETT v. MT. ZION BAPTIST CHURCH OF PORT CHESTER, INC. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. ____ Appeal from (2d dept.: 280 App. Div. 798) MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL. Denied.
BENNINGTON CORP. v. CITATION FABRICS CORP., 304 N.Y. 985 (____)
BENNINGTON CORP. v. CITATION FABRICS CORP. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. ____ Appeal from (1st dept.: 280 App. Div. 756) MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL. Dismissed. (Same in full, ante, p. 870.)
MATTER OF BERGERMAN v. BYRNES, 304 N.Y. 985 (____)
BERGERMAN, MATTER OF, v. BYRNES Court of Appeals of the State of New York. ____ Appeal from (1st dept.: 280 App. Div. 884) MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL. Granted.
MATTER OF BREWKA v. MOLLET, 304 N.Y. 985 (____)
BREWKA, MATTER OF, v. MOLLET Court of Appeals of the State of New York. ____ Appeal from (3d dept.: 279 App. Div. 1104) MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL. Denied.
MATTER OF BISHOP, 304 N.Y. 985 (____)
BISHOP, MATTER OF (HAZEL BISHOP, INC.) Court of Appeals of the State of New York. ____ Appeal from (1st dept.: 280 App. Div. 887) MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL. Denied.
MATTER OF BROWN v. STICHMAN, 304 N.Y. 985 (____)
BROWN, MATTER OF, v. STICHMAN Court of Appeals of the State of New York. ____ Appeal from (1st dept.: 280 App. Div. 919) MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL. Denied.
MATTER OF BRAZIL OITICICA, INC., 304 N.Y. 985 (____)
BRAZIL OITICICA, INC., MATTER OF (HATCO CHEMICAL CO.) Court of Appeals of the State of New York. ____ Appeal from (1st dept.: 279 App. Div. 1007) MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL. Denied.
BOARD OF EDUC. OF CITY OF SYRACUSE v. KING, 304 N.Y. 985 (____)
BOARD OF EDUC. OF CITY OF SYRACUSE v. KING Court of Appeals of the State of New York. ____ Appeal from (4th dept.: 280 App. Div. 458) MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL. Dismissed. (Same in full, ante, p. 973.)
BERKOWSKY v. WILLIAMS CO., INC., 304 N.Y. 985 (____)
BERKOWSKY v. WILLIAMS CO., INC. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. ____ Appeal from (1st dept.: 279 App. Div. 895) MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL. Denied.
MATTER OF BLACKPORT ESTATES, INC. v. McGOLDRICK, 304 N.Y. 985 (____)
BLACKPORT ESTATES, INC., MATTER OF, v. McGOLDRICK Court of Appeals of the State of New York. ____ Appeal from (1st dept.: 280 App. Div. 329) MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL. Denied.
BRIDGE HARDWARE CO., INC. v. HOROWITZ, 304 N.Y. 985 (____)
BRIDGE HARDWARE CO., INC., v. HOROWITZ Court of Appeals of the State of New York. ____ Appeal from (1st dept.: 279 App. Div. 1073) MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL. Denied.
BACK CO., INC. v. SCHMITT, 304 N.Y. 985 (____)
BACK CO., INC., v. SCHMITT Court of Appeals of the State of New York. ____ Appeal from (2d dept.: 279 App. Div. 874) MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL. Denied.
MATTER OF BRUNSON v. AMERICAN MAGNESIUM CORP., 304 N.Y. 985 (____)
BRUNSON, MATTER OF, v. AMERICAN MAGNESIUM CORP. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. ____ Appeal from (3d dept.: 279 App. Div. 1109) MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL. Denied. Page 986
MATTER OF BARRY v. O’CONNELL, 304 N.Y. 985 (____)
BARRY, MATTER OF, v. O’CONNELL Court of Appeals of the State of New York. ____ Appeal from (App.Div., 1st dept., April 30, 1952) MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL. Granted.