119 N.E. 1045 GLOBE LITHOGRAPHING COMPANY, Respondent, v. MORRIS PARK ESTATES, Appellant. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued February 6, 1918 Decided February 26, 1918 Page 535 Ralph Royall for appellant. Manfred W. Ehrich for respondent. Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., COLLIN, CUDDEBACK, CARDOZO, POUND, CRANE and […]
Articles Tagged: 119 N.E. 1045
ARNOW v. CARMEL REALTY COMPANY, 223 N.Y. 660 (1918)
119 N.E. 1045 HENRY ARNOW, Respondent, v. CARMEL REALTY COMPANY, Appellant. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Submitted April 22, 1918 Decided April 30, 1918 Simon O. Pollock for motion. Max Monfried opposed. Motion denied. Page 661
GRAFTON v. BALL, 223 N.Y. 538 (1918)
119 N.E. 1045 ROBERT GRAFTON, Respondent, v. JOHN OSCAR BALL, Appellant. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Submitted February 8, 1918 Decided February 26, 1918 A.P. Bachman for appellant. Vine H. Smith and John B. Johnston for respondent. Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., COLLIN, CUDDEBACK, CARDOZO, POUND and […]
GOULD v. FLEITMANN, 223 N.Y. 604 (1918)
119 N.E. 1045 EDWIN GOULD, Respondent, v. LIDA M. FLEITMANN, as Administratrix of the Estate of F. AUGUSTUS HEINZE, Deceased, Appellant. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued March 13, 1918 Decided March 26, 1918 Edgar T. Brackett for appellant. Alton B. Parker and Emery H. Sykes for respondent. Judgment affirmed, with costs; […]
MATTER OF GOLDSCHMIDT v. HARDY, 223 N.Y. 575 (1918)
119 N.E. 1045 In the Matter of the Application of HERMANN E. GOLDSCHMIDT, Appellant, for a Peremptory Writ of Mandamus against LAMAR HARDY, as Corporation Counsel of the City of New York, Respondent. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued February 27, 1918 Decided March 19, 1918 Page 576 Clarence U. Carruth, Charles […]