109 N.E. 1092 In the Matter of the Application of FREDERIC W. SHEPARD, Appellant, for a Writ of Mandamus against CHARLES STRAUSS et al., as Commissioners of the Board of Water Supply of the City of New York, Respondents. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued April 14, 1915 Decided May 4, 1915 […]
Articles Tagged: 109 N.E. 1092
SCOFIELD v. FITZSIMMONS, 215 N.Y. 684 (1915)
109 N.E. 1092 SETH W. SCOFIELD, Appellant, v. JEAN W. FITZSIMMONS, Respondent. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Submitted May 24, 1915 Decided June 1, 1915 Page 685 Irwin Untermeyer for motion. John Willett opposed. Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion.
SMITH v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ALBANY, 214 N.Y. 706 (1915)
109 N.E. 1092 FRANK G. SMITH, Respondent, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ALBANY et al., Appellants. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued April 12, 1915 Decided April 20, 1915 Richard J. Donovan for motion. James F. Tracey and George Lawyer opposed. Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Page 707
MATTER OF SOUTHWORTH, 215 N.Y. 719 (1915)
109 N.E. 1092 In the Matter of the Accounting of FREDERICK A. SOUTHWORTH et al., as Executors of WILLIAM LUDDEN, Deceased, Respondents. BROOKLYN BUREAU OF CHARITIES et al., Appellants. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued June 2, 1915 Decided June 18, 1915 William G. Cooke and Howard O. Wood for appellants. Alfred […]
MATTER OF SORIANO v. KANE, 215 N.Y. 712 (1915)
109 N.E. 1092 In the Matter of the Application of JOSEPH SORIANO, Appellant, for a Writ of Habeas Corpus against JAMES KANE, Warden of the City Prison in the County of Kings, Respondent. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Submitted June 7, 1915 Decided June 15, 1915 Page 713 Frank L. Polk, Corporation […]
SCOFIELD v. POWERS, 215 N.Y. 683 (1915)
109 N.E. 1092 JAMES M. SCOFIELD, Respondent, v. MARY E. POWERS, Appellant. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued May 13, 1915 Decided June 1, 1915 Milton S. Hoffman for appellant. George H. Taylor, Jr., and George W. Simpson for respondent. Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., HISCOCK, […]
SAMUEL v. HOLBROOK, CABOT ROLLINS CORPORATION, 215 N.Y. 641 (1915)
109 N.E. 1092 FRANK SAMUEL et al., Doing Business under the Firm Name of FRANK SAMUEL, Respondents, v. HOLBROOK, CABOT ROLLINS CORPORATION, Appellant. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued April 26, 1915 Decided May 11, 1915 Page 642 Thomas E. O’Brien and Thomas F Conway for appellant. Frederick C. McLaughlin for respondents. […]