ROSENBLUTH v. SACKADORF, 298 N.Y. 631 (1948)

82 N.E.2d 27

NATHAN ROSENBLUTH, Appellant, v. SOL SACKADORF et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Submitted October 4, 1948
Decided October 6, 1948

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County, FROESSEL, J.

Page 632

Milton M. Eisenberg for motion.

Herbert L. Fine and Samuel Douglas opposed.

Motion denied (Civ. Prac. Act, § 558; Siegelbaum v Dowling, 279 N.Y. 22). The time within which respondents may serve and file copies of the points to be relied on by them is extended to twenty days after entry of the order hereon.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 82 N.E.2d 27

Recent Posts

WOOD v. DUFF-GORDON, Wood v. Duff-Gordon, 222 N.Y. 88 (1917)

222 N.Y. 88 (1917) Dec 4, 1917 · New York Court of Appeals Otis F. Wood, Appellant,…

1 week ago

RAHABI v. MORRISON, 81 A.D.2d 434

81 A.D.2d 434 (1981) 440 N.Y.S. 2d 941 Aharon Rahabi, Appellant, v. Jack Morrison et…

2 weeks ago

MATTER OF SCHLINGER, 48 Misc.2d 345 (1965)

48 Misc.2d 345 (1965) In the Matter of The Estate of Joseph Schlinger, Deceased. Surrogate's…

2 weeks ago

BARTOLONE v. JECKOVICH, 481 N.Y.S. 2d 545 (1984).

103 A.D.2d 632 (1984)481 N.Y.S. 2d 545 Angelo J. Bartolone, Appellant, v. Lynne A. L.…

2 weeks ago

Matter of C.C. v D.C., 2025 NY Slip Op 05017 (Sept. 18, 2025)

Matter of C.C. v D.C. 2025 NY Slip Op 05017 Decided on September 18, 2025…

2 months ago

Japanese Med. Care PLLC v. Tamba, 2025 NY Slip Op 05015 (Sept. 18, 2025)

Japanese Med. Care PLLC v Tamba 2025 NY Slip Op 05015 Decided on September 18,…

2 months ago