PRINCE v. INTERNATIONAL RAILWAY COMPANY, 220 N.Y. 561 (1917)

115 N.E. 1050

NICHOLAS PRINCE, an Infant, by ANTONIO PRINCE, His Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. INTERNATIONAL RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued December 13, 1916
Decided January 9, 1917

Harold S. Brown for appellant.

Wortley B. Paul for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Page 562

Concur: HOGAN, CARDOZO and POUND, JJ.; HISCOCK, Ch. J., CHASE, COLLIN and CUDDEBACK, JJ., concur on the ground that the question whether the act complained of was within the scope of the conductor’s authority was not sufficiently raised at the trial.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

CORDAS v. PEERLESS TRANSP. CO., 27 N.Y.S.2d 198 (1941)

27 N.Y.S.2d 198 CORDAS et al. v. PEERLESS TRANSP. CO. et al. City Court of…

7 days ago

WOOD v. DUFF-GORDON, Wood v. Duff-Gordon, 222 N.Y. 88 (1917)

222 N.Y. 88 (1917) Dec 4, 1917 · New York Court of Appeals Otis F. Wood, Appellant,…

3 weeks ago

RAHABI v. MORRISON, 81 A.D.2d 434

81 A.D.2d 434 (1981) 440 N.Y.S. 2d 941 Aharon Rahabi, Appellant, v. Jack Morrison et…

3 weeks ago

MATTER OF SCHLINGER, 48 Misc.2d 345 (1965)

48 Misc.2d 345 (1965) In the Matter of The Estate of Joseph Schlinger, Deceased. Surrogate's…

3 weeks ago

BARTOLONE v. JECKOVICH, 481 N.Y.S. 2d 545 (1984).

103 A.D.2d 632 (1984)481 N.Y.S. 2d 545 Angelo J. Bartolone, Appellant, v. Lynne A. L.…

3 weeks ago

Matter of C.C. v D.C., 2025 NY Slip Op 05017 (Sept. 18, 2025)

Matter of C.C. v D.C. 2025 NY Slip Op 05017 Decided on September 18, 2025…

2 months ago