85 N.E.2d 68
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Submitted March 4, 1949
Decided March 4, 1949
Application to amend remittitur granted. Recall of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended by adding thereto the following: “Upon this appeal there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: The defendants argued that the denial of the motion for a new trial deprived them of due process of law under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. This court held that the denial of the motion did not violate any rights guaranteed to the defendants by said provision of the United States Constitution.”
Page 930
[EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS PAGE IS BLANK.]Page 931
27 N.Y.S.2d 198 CORDAS et al. v. PEERLESS TRANSP. CO. et al. City Court of…
222 N.Y. 88 (1917) Dec 4, 1917 · New York Court of Appeals Otis F. Wood, Appellant,…
81 A.D.2d 434 (1981) 440 N.Y.S. 2d 941 Aharon Rahabi, Appellant, v. Jack Morrison et…
48 Misc.2d 345 (1965) In the Matter of The Estate of Joseph Schlinger, Deceased. Surrogate's…
103 A.D.2d 632 (1984)481 N.Y.S. 2d 545 Angelo J. Bartolone, Appellant, v. Lynne A. L.…
Matter of C.C. v D.C. 2025 NY Slip Op 05017 Decided on September 18, 2025…