Salvatore J. Nicosia, Esq., Village Attorney

Attorney General of New York — Opinion
Issued on: November 7, 1990

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW, § 2.10(26), 2.20; EXECUTIVE LAW, ART2-B.

Auxiliary police officers may direct and control traffic during officialdrills and in connection with such drills may be given the authority toissue simplified traffic informations.

James D. Cole, Assistant Attorney General

Requestor: Salvatore J. Nicosia, Esq., Village Attorney Village of Farmingdale P.O. Box 220 Farmingdale, New York 11735

Written by: James D. Cole, Assistant Attorney General in Charge of Opinions

You have asked whether a village can authorize its auxiliary police to issue parking tickets.

Auxiliary police officers who have been designated as peace officers exercise peace officer powers during a period of imminent or actual enemy attack and while combating a natural or man-made disaster (Criminal Procedure Law, § 2.10[26]; Executive Law, Art 2-B). Additionally, these officers have the power to direct and control traffic during official drills in preparation for an attack or in preparation for combating natural or man-made disasters (1984 Op Atty Gen [Inf] 114; Criminal Procedure Law, § 2.10[26]). In this latter role, auxiliary police officers possess only those powers set forth in section 2.20 of the Criminal Procedure Law that are needed to direct and control traffic (ibid.). The extent to which auxiliary police may be used for traffic control is a factual matter, depending on the training needs of a particular municipality (1984 Op Atty Gen [Inf] 114). In engaging in traffic control, auxiliary police officers may be given the authority to issue simplified traffic informations (Criminal Procedure Law, § 2.20[5]).

We conclude that auxiliary police officers may direct and control traffic during official drills and in connection with such drills may be given the authority to issue simplified traffic informations.

The Attorney General renders formal opinions only to officers and departments of the State government. This perforce is an informal and unofficial expression of views of this office.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: I90-75

Recent Posts

WOOD v. DUFF-GORDON, Wood v. Duff-Gordon, 222 N.Y. 88 (1917)

222 N.Y. 88 (1917) Dec 4, 1917 · New York Court of Appeals Otis F. Wood, Appellant,…

1 week ago

RAHABI v. MORRISON, 81 A.D.2d 434

81 A.D.2d 434 (1981) 440 N.Y.S. 2d 941 Aharon Rahabi, Appellant, v. Jack Morrison et…

2 weeks ago

MATTER OF SCHLINGER, 48 Misc.2d 345 (1965)

48 Misc.2d 345 (1965) In the Matter of The Estate of Joseph Schlinger, Deceased. Surrogate's…

2 weeks ago

BARTOLONE v. JECKOVICH, 481 N.Y.S. 2d 545 (1984).

103 A.D.2d 632 (1984)481 N.Y.S. 2d 545 Angelo J. Bartolone, Appellant, v. Lynne A. L.…

2 weeks ago

Matter of C.C. v D.C., 2025 NY Slip Op 05017 (Sept. 18, 2025)

Matter of C.C. v D.C. 2025 NY Slip Op 05017 Decided on September 18, 2025…

2 months ago

Japanese Med. Care PLLC v. Tamba, 2025 NY Slip Op 05015 (Sept. 18, 2025)

Japanese Med. Care PLLC v Tamba 2025 NY Slip Op 05015 Decided on September 18,…

2 months ago