121 N.E. 853
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Submitted April 22, 1918
Decided June 4, 1918
Selden Bacon for motion.
John Ewen and R.W. Kellogg opposed.
Per Curiam.
The Appellate Division modified the surrogate’s decree in respect of the award of costs. The order was, therefore, one of modification within the meaning of section 190, subdivision 1, of the Code of Civil Procedure, and an appeal to this court may be taken of right. The appellant is not required to show that the modification resulted to her prejudice. The statute contemplates an appeal to this court whenever the Appellate Division has found error in the whole or in any part of the judgment or final order before it for review. On the ground that leave to appeal is unnecessary the motion is denied, without costs.
Page 546
27 N.Y.S.2d 198 CORDAS et al. v. PEERLESS TRANSP. CO. et al. City Court of…
222 N.Y. 88 (1917) Dec 4, 1917 · New York Court of Appeals Otis F. Wood, Appellant,…
81 A.D.2d 434 (1981) 440 N.Y.S. 2d 941 Aharon Rahabi, Appellant, v. Jack Morrison et…
48 Misc.2d 345 (1965) In the Matter of The Estate of Joseph Schlinger, Deceased. Surrogate's…
103 A.D.2d 632 (1984)481 N.Y.S. 2d 545 Angelo J. Bartolone, Appellant, v. Lynne A. L.…
Matter of C.C. v D.C. 2025 NY Slip Op 05017 Decided on September 18, 2025…