2 N.E.2d 659
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued May 19, 1936
Decided May 26, 1936
Page 283
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
Page 284
Samuel Plumer for appellant.
Paul Windels, Corporation Counsel (Edmund L. Palmieri an Paxton Blair of counsel), for respondent.
Per Curiam.
Appellant was not entitled to resort to the remedy of mandamus without availing herself of the right to appeal to the Board of Standards and Appeals. (Matter of Towers Management Corp. v Thatcher, 271 N.Y. 94; decided May 19, 1936.) That Board is also empowered on a proper application to consider the argument here made on the basis of unnecessary hardship. (Amended Building Zone Resolution, § 21; see New York Code of Ordinances, Appendix B.)
The order should be affirmed, without costs.
CRANE, Ch. J., LEHMAN, O’BRIEN, HUBBS, CROUCH, LOUGHRAN and FINCH, JJ., concur.
Order affirmed.
Page 285
222 N.Y. 88 (1917) Dec 4, 1917 · New York Court of Appeals Otis F. Wood, Appellant,…
81 A.D.2d 434 (1981) 440 N.Y.S. 2d 941 Aharon Rahabi, Appellant, v. Jack Morrison et…
48 Misc.2d 345 (1965) In the Matter of The Estate of Joseph Schlinger, Deceased. Surrogate's…
103 A.D.2d 632 (1984)481 N.Y.S. 2d 545 Angelo J. Bartolone, Appellant, v. Lynne A. L.…
Matter of C.C. v D.C. 2025 NY Slip Op 05017 Decided on September 18, 2025…
Japanese Med. Care PLLC v Tamba 2025 NY Slip Op 05015 Decided on September 18,…