173 N.E. 897
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued October 20, 1930
Decided October 22, 1930
Appeal from the Supreme Court of Monroe County.
Page 631
Frank H. Hiscock and James E. Cuff for appellant.
Ralph H. Culley for respondent.
Per Curiam.
We think this case is controlled by the decision in Matter of Gilfillan v. Beyer (124 Misc. Rep. 628; 240 N.Y. 579), where the facts were almost identical.
Nothing that was said in Matter of Callaghan v. Voorhis
(252 N.Y. 14) was intended to impair the authority of that decision. The court did no more than apply the principle previously enforced to the particular situation then before it. Indeed, the Gilfillan case was cited as authority.
The order should be affirmed without costs.
CARDOZO, Ch. J., POUND, KELLOGG and O’BRIEN, JJ., concur; CRANE and HUBBS, JJ., dissent; LEHMAN, J., not voting.
Order affirmed.
27 N.Y.S.2d 198 CORDAS et al. v. PEERLESS TRANSP. CO. et al. City Court of…
222 N.Y. 88 (1917) Dec 4, 1917 · New York Court of Appeals Otis F. Wood, Appellant,…
81 A.D.2d 434 (1981) 440 N.Y.S. 2d 941 Aharon Rahabi, Appellant, v. Jack Morrison et…
48 Misc.2d 345 (1965) In the Matter of The Estate of Joseph Schlinger, Deceased. Surrogate's…
103 A.D.2d 632 (1984)481 N.Y.S. 2d 545 Angelo J. Bartolone, Appellant, v. Lynne A. L.…
Matter of C.C. v D.C. 2025 NY Slip Op 05017 Decided on September 18, 2025…