699 N.E.2d 426
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Submitted April 6, 1998
Decided June 11, 1998
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that appellant has failed to demonstrate the timeliness of this motion as required by 500.11(d)(1)(iii) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.11 [d] [1] [iii]).
27 N.Y.S.2d 198 CORDAS et al. v. PEERLESS TRANSP. CO. et al. City Court of…
222 N.Y. 88 (1917) Dec 4, 1917 · New York Court of Appeals Otis F. Wood, Appellant,…
81 A.D.2d 434 (1981) 440 N.Y.S. 2d 941 Aharon Rahabi, Appellant, v. Jack Morrison et…
48 Misc.2d 345 (1965) In the Matter of The Estate of Joseph Schlinger, Deceased. Surrogate's…
103 A.D.2d 632 (1984)481 N.Y.S. 2d 545 Angelo J. Bartolone, Appellant, v. Lynne A. L.…
Matter of C.C. v D.C. 2025 NY Slip Op 05017 Decided on September 18, 2025…