98 N.E.2d 886

In the Matter of the Construction of the Will of SAMUEL BLUESTEIN, Deceased. MURRAY GOODMAN et al., as Executors of SAMUEL BLUESTEIN, Deceased, Appellants; ROSE BLUESTEIN, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued February 26, 1951
Decided April 12, 1951

Page 761

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, FRANKENTHALER, S.

Page 762

Ilo Orleans for appellants.

Harold M. Weinberg for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs to each party appearing separately and filing separate briefs payable out of the estate. No opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, and FROESSEL, JJ. FULD, J., dissents upon the ground that, in making a gift to his business associate of “any and all interest” in his accounting practice, the testator intended an absolute and unconditional bequest.

Tagged: