65 N.E. 1123
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued October 24, 1902
Decided November 11, 1902
James C. de La Mare for appellant.
Henry G.K. Heath for respondent.
Per Curiam.
This appeal presents the same questions, arising in the same way and argued at the same time as the case of John Lowry against this defendant. (172 N.Y. 394.) The complaint in each action made out a clear case for relief on the ground of usury, unless the general statute against taking interest at a rate greater than is allowed by law is repealed by implication as to corporations organized under
Page 634
chapter 326 of the Laws of 1895. We apply the principle of that case to the one now before us and affirm the judgment, with costs, on our opinion in the other action.
PARKER, Ch. J., GRAY, O’BRIEN, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, MARTIN and VANN, JJ., concur.
Judgment affirmed.
222 N.Y. 88 (1917) Dec 4, 1917 · New York Court of Appeals Otis F. Wood, Appellant,…
81 A.D.2d 434 (1981) 440 N.Y.S. 2d 941 Aharon Rahabi, Appellant, v. Jack Morrison et…
48 Misc.2d 345 (1965) In the Matter of The Estate of Joseph Schlinger, Deceased. Surrogate's…
103 A.D.2d 632 (1984)481 N.Y.S. 2d 545 Angelo J. Bartolone, Appellant, v. Lynne A. L.…
Matter of C.C. v D.C. 2025 NY Slip Op 05017 Decided on September 18, 2025…
Japanese Med. Care PLLC v Tamba 2025 NY Slip Op 05015 Decided on September 18,…