32 N.E.2d 552
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.Argued November 27, 1940
Decided December 31, 1940
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, O’BRIEN, J.
Page 558
[EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]Page 559
Lee Hazen, Julius M. Arnstein and Joseph Dannenberg for appellant.
Stuart N. Updike and James W. Rodgers for respondent.
Per Curiam.
The majority of the court are agreed that the question of whether the plaintiff is entitled to any damages is one of fact rather than of law. We are all agreed that there should be a new trial on the ground
Page 560
that the trial court erroneously admitted testimony of the witness Daniel.
The judgment of the trial court and the judgment of dismissal of the Appellate Division should be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.
LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, FINCH, RIPPEY, SEARS, LEWIS and CONWAY, JJ., concur.
Judgments reversed, etc.
27 N.Y.S.2d 198 CORDAS et al. v. PEERLESS TRANSP. CO. et al. City Court of…
222 N.Y. 88 (1917) Dec 4, 1917 · New York Court of Appeals Otis F. Wood, Appellant,…
81 A.D.2d 434 (1981) 440 N.Y.S. 2d 941 Aharon Rahabi, Appellant, v. Jack Morrison et…
48 Misc.2d 345 (1965) In the Matter of The Estate of Joseph Schlinger, Deceased. Surrogate's…
103 A.D.2d 632 (1984)481 N.Y.S. 2d 545 Angelo J. Bartolone, Appellant, v. Lynne A. L.…
Matter of C.C. v D.C. 2025 NY Slip Op 05017 Decided on September 18, 2025…