Informal Opinion No. 85-57

Walter E. Moxham, Jr., Esq.

Attorney General of New York — Opinion
Dated: July 22, 1985

GENERAL MUNICIPAL LAW, § 239-b; PUBLIC AUTHORITIES LAW, §§1282(4), 1677; PUBLIC OFFICERS LAW, § 9.

A commissioner of highways may not generally delegate to his deputy the responsibility to attend meetings of a regional planning board.

Walter E. Moxham, Jr., Esq. Assistant County Attorney, Niagara

You have asked whether a county highway commissioner can designate the deputy commissioner of highways to attend meetings of a regional planning board.

Section 239-b of the General Municipal Law defines the membership of a regional planning board. The county engineer, superintendent of highways, or district superintendent in each participating county “shall be a member ex-officio of any such regional or county planning board”. This section makes no provision for the designation, by proxy, of a substitute to attend the meetings of the regional planning board in the absence of the commissioner of highways. (Compare sections 1282[4] and 1677 of the Public Authorities Law.)

Under section 9 of the Public Officers Law, unless otherwise prescribed by law, a deputy “possess[es] the powers and perform[s] the duties of his principal during the absence or inability to act of his principal, or during a vacancy in his principal’s office”. In our view, this language is insufficient to permit an officer generally to delegate to a deputy the responsibility to attend meetings of a regional planning board. A deputy would have this authority only during the absence or inability to act of his principal or when a vacancy occurs in the principal’s office. While we have not found any cases or opinions on point, it appears that under section 9 it is necessary to judge each case to determine whether the principal is absent or unable to act to determine whether a deputy may attend a meeting of the regional planning board. (See 1901 Report of the Atty Gen 259 and 1914 Op Atty Gen 143.)

We conclude that a commissioner of highways may not generally delegate to his deputy the responsibility to attend meetings of a regional planning board.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 85-57

Recent Posts

WOOD v. DUFF-GORDON, Wood v. Duff-Gordon, 222 N.Y. 88 (1917)

222 N.Y. 88 (1917) Dec 4, 1917 · New York Court of Appeals Otis F. Wood, Appellant,…

4 days ago

RAHABI v. MORRISON, 81 A.D.2d 434

81 A.D.2d 434 (1981) 440 N.Y.S. 2d 941 Aharon Rahabi, Appellant, v. Jack Morrison et…

1 week ago

MATTER OF SCHLINGER, 48 Misc.2d 345 (1965)

48 Misc.2d 345 (1965) In the Matter of The Estate of Joseph Schlinger, Deceased. Surrogate's…

1 week ago

BARTOLONE v. JECKOVICH, 481 N.Y.S. 2d 545 (1984).

103 A.D.2d 632 (1984)481 N.Y.S. 2d 545 Angelo J. Bartolone, Appellant, v. Lynne A. L.…

1 week ago

Matter of C.C. v D.C., 2025 NY Slip Op 05017 (Sept. 18, 2025)

Matter of C.C. v D.C. 2025 NY Slip Op 05017 Decided on September 18, 2025…

2 months ago

Japanese Med. Care PLLC v. Tamba, 2025 NY Slip Op 05015 (Sept. 18, 2025)

Japanese Med. Care PLLC v Tamba 2025 NY Slip Op 05015 Decided on September 18,…

2 months ago