BLAIS v. DEYO, 60 N.Y.2d 679 (1983)

455 N.E.2d 662, 468 N.Y.S.2d 103

MADELINE BLAIS et al., Appellants, v. ALDEN DEYO, JR., Respondent, et al., Defendant. (And Another Appeal.)

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Decided September 27, 1983

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, CARROL S. WALSH, JR., J.

Page 680

Lois McS. Webb for appellants.

John L. Bell for respondent.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.

In granting the motion to dismiss on the ground of forum non conveniens, the Appellate Division did not abuse its discretion as a matter of law or in exercising that discretion fail to take into account all of the various factors entitled to consideration (Irrigation Ind. Dev. Corp. v Indag, S.A., 37 N.Y.2d 522, 525).

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER and SIMONS concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.